Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

FARIDA AND OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Farida And Others v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 4704 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 5874 (10 March 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

It is submitted that co-accused Jaqir, Sabana and Farhat have already been released on bail by this Court vide order dated 20.2.2006. It is contended that undue delay took place in lodging the F.I.R. and F.I.R. was actually lodged after the death of the lady. In her dying declaration, the deceased made general allegations against father-in-law  mother-in-law, sisters-in-law and others and no specific role was assigned to the applicants. It is also contended that it was husband who took the deceased to hospital and moved an application also to S.P., Bijnor that the lady sustained burn injuries while she was cooking food.

On the other hand, the application is opposed on the ground that the lady had named the applicants in her dying declaration and there is no delay in lodging the F.I.R. as urged by the applicants' learned counsel.

Considering all facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the facts that the aforesaid three accused who allegedly played the common role in the crime have already been released on bail, I find that present applicants also deserve bail.

Let the applicants-Farida, Ayub and Sazid be enlarged on bail on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bijnor in case crime no. 990 of 2005, under Sections 498A/304B I.P.C. and ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Nagina Dehat, District Bijnor.

10.3.2006

OP/4704/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.