Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Jai Kumar Tiwari v. Union Of India And Others - WRIT - C No. 14750 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 5893 (10 March 2006)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.

Hon'ble  R.K.Rastogi,J

The petitioner  was one of the applicants  for diesel/petrol outlet dealership under the  scheme Kisan Sewa Kendra for the area Gangamau district Kannauj. It was not allotted to him. He has filed the present writ petition  for a direction to the respondents not to allot the same to respondent no. 6.

We have heard  the  counsel for the petitioner,  the Standing Counsel and Sri  Prakash Padia for  the   respondents.

According to the counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner could not  not be allotted zero mark under the head 'Finance' and as such allotment of marks  done by the respondents is illegal.

In the circumstances of the case,  it will be  appropriate  that the petitioner  may file fresh representation before respondent no. 4. In case the representation is  filed, the same  may be decided  by the said respondent by a reasoned order at an early date,  if possible, within three months from the date of receipt of the representation. The petitioner will  file  a certified copy of this order; necessary  documents and a duly stamped self addressed envelope along with the representation. The concerned   authority after taking decision will  communicate the same to the petitioner. Needless to add that  respondent no. 4 while passing any order  on the petitioner's representation will also  give an opportunity of hearing to the respondent no. 6.

Till the representation of the petitioner is decided, no one of the applicants will be allotted diesel/petrol outlet dealership for the said area.

With these observations the writ petition is disposed of.

Dated: 10.3.2006



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.