High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Jai Kumar Tiwari v. Union Of India And Others - WRIT - C No. 14750 of 2006  RD-AH 5893 (10 March 2006)
Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.
The petitioner was one of the applicants for diesel/petrol outlet dealership under the scheme Kisan Sewa Kendra for the area Gangamau district Kannauj. It was not allotted to him. He has filed the present writ petition for a direction to the respondents not to allot the same to respondent no. 6.
We have heard the counsel for the petitioner, the Standing Counsel and Sri Prakash Padia for the respondents.
According to the counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner could not not be allotted zero mark under the head 'Finance' and as such allotment of marks done by the respondents is illegal.
In the circumstances of the case, it will be appropriate that the petitioner may file fresh representation before respondent no. 4. In case the representation is filed, the same may be decided by the said respondent by a reasoned order at an early date, if possible, within three months from the date of receipt of the representation. The petitioner will file a certified copy of this order; necessary documents and a duly stamped self addressed envelope along with the representation. The concerned authority after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner. Needless to add that respondent no. 4 while passing any order on the petitioner's representation will also give an opportunity of hearing to the respondent no. 6.
Till the representation of the petitioner is decided, no one of the applicants will be allotted diesel/petrol outlet dealership for the said area.
With these observations the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.