Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

LOKNATH versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Loknath v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 4933 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 5903 (10 March 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh , J.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. He has not been put for identification. The only allegation against him is that  his name was disclosed by the first informant himself by moving an application after 90 days of the alleged occurrence. The naming of the applicant is after thought because he was well known to the first informant prior to the alleged occurrence.

It is opposed by the learned A.G.A. by submitting that the applicant is having criminal antecedents and some other cases are pending against the applicant.

After considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without entering into the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Lokh Nath   involved in Case Crime No. 91 of 2004, under Section 393, 307 and 323 I.P.C.  Police Station Mau , District Chitrakoot be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two  sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the condition the applicant shall report to the court of learned CJ.M. Concerned till the conclusion of the trial in the first week of each month, in default it shall be open to the learned Sessions Judge to cancel the bail of the applicant granted to him.

Dt: 10.03.2006

Rcv/4933-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.