High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Loknath v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 4933 of 2006  RD-AH 5903 (10 March 2006)
Hon'ble Ravindra Singh , J.
Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R. He has not been put for identification. The only allegation against him is that his name was disclosed by the first informant himself by moving an application after 90 days of the alleged occurrence. The naming of the applicant is after thought because he was well known to the first informant prior to the alleged occurrence.
It is opposed by the learned A.G.A. by submitting that the applicant is having criminal antecedents and some other cases are pending against the applicant.
After considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without entering into the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
Let the applicant Lokh Nath involved in Case Crime No. 91 of 2004, under Section 393, 307 and 323 I.P.C. Police Station Mau , District Chitrakoot be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the condition the applicant shall report to the court of learned CJ.M. Concerned till the conclusion of the trial in the first week of each month, in default it shall be open to the learned Sessions Judge to cancel the bail of the applicant granted to him.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.