Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJESH KUMAR versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Rajesh Kumar v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 166 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 592 (9 January 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No. 19

Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.166 of 2006

Rajesh Kumar.....Vs.....State of U.P.

...

Hon'ble Alok Kumar Singh, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. and also perused the material on record.

The applicant is involved in case crime No.170 of 2005, for the offence under Section 302, I.P.C., Police Station Eka, district Firozabad.

It is alleged that on account of some quarrel between  the children   on 16.10.2005,  on the next date i.e. on 17.10.2005 at about 7.30 a.m.  all the four accused  who are the real brothers, surrounded  the deceased and killed him. The F.I.R. was lodged the same day at 10.05 a.m. The post mortem report shows one incised wound on the vital part of the deceased which caused his death.

Against  the genuineness of the prosecution case and proposed  evidence  as also involvement of the accused, it was argued  that  the applicant  has been assigned lathi  but there is no injury of lathi on the body of the deceased.  The post mortem report shows a single injury of incised wound. His bail was rejected only on the ground  that all the four accused are  real brothers and they  surrounded the deceased and killed him. Out of them  Munesh Kumar  and Mukesh  who were assigned the role of catching hold  have already been granted bail  by this Court vide order dated 21.12.2005 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 23248 of 2005. The main allegation is against co-accused  Naresh Kumar and as such  applicant's case is distinguishable. There is no criminal history against him.

The bail is, however, opposed by the learned A.G.A.

The points pertaining to nature of accusation, severity of punishment, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witnesses, prima facie satisfaction of the Court  regarding  proposed evidence and genuineness of the prosecution  case were duly considered.

 In view of the entire facts and circumstances of the case, taking into  consideration some of the arguments, advanced on behalf of the applicant in respect of the points discussed herein above  significantly  absence of any injury of lathi and also the ground of partial  parity, without prejudice to the merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail. Let the applicant be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Court.  

Dt. 9.1.2006.

Rkb.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.