Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Smt. Kallo Devi v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 20370 of 2005 [2006] RD-AH 6491 (23 March 2006)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Court No.7

Civil Misc. Writ No. 20370 of 2005

Smt.Kallo                                                         Petitioner


State of U.P and others.                                     Respondents.

Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari, J

           Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.

          The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been paid the post retiral dues as well as pension by the respondents.

            Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged.

The counsel for the respondents has relied upon the averments made in para 6 of the counter affidavit and submits that   the aforesaid dues of the petitioner could not be paid to the petitioner due to financial crisis.

              Financial crisis is not a ground for non-payment of retiral dues of a retired employee as the employee has a right to live with dignity enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

         The controversy of the instant writ petition is squarely covered by the controversy involved in Civil Misc. Writ No.21297 of 2004 Rasheed Ali  Vs.State of U.P. and others  decided on 20.9.2005.    

           In view of ratio decided in Rasheed Ali''s case (supra) this writ petition is allowed with the direction that the aforesaid dues  of the petitioner, from the due date till the date of payment shall be paid by the respondent nos.2 and 3 with 10% compound interest within a period of one month from today otherwise the State Government will act in accordance with law against the erring officials of the Nagar Nigam and will also recover the legitimate amount dues to the petitioner as arrears of land revenue within one month thereafter and pay the same to the petitioner forthwith within a week of recovery. Cost is assessed as Rs.5000/- on respondent nos. 2 and 3 to be paid to the petitioner within a month for not taking action for payment of legitimate dues of the petitioner, and in making the petitioner run from pillar to post for her legitimate claim without any just cause. The respondent nos.2 and 3 will also ensure payment of    pension to the petitioner month to month, as and when it falls due.

Dated 23.3.2006



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.