High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Shiv Dayal Sharma v. Dakshinanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. And Others - WRIT - C No. 16033 of 2006  RD-AH 6583 (24 March 2006)
Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.
The petitioner was given proposed assessment notice on 16.2.2006. He has already replied the same on 24.2.2006 to the respondent no. 2. As it has not been decided, present writ petition has been filed.
We have heard counsel for the petitioner, the Standing Counsel and Sri W.H. Khan for the respondents.
In the circumstances of the case,it would be appropriate that the petitioner's representation dated 24.2.2006 may be decided by the concerned respondent by a reasoned order at an early date, if possible, within three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petitioner along with certified copy of this order will also file a copy of his aforesaid representation, other necessary documents and a duly stamped self addressed envelope. The concerned authority after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner.
With these observations the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.