Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ALOK GOEL versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, U.P.F.C. KANPUR AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Alok Goel v. Managing Director, U.P.F.C. Kanpur And Others - WRIT - C No. 16456 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 6608 (27 March 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon. Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.

Hon. Dilip Gupta, J.

This writ petition has been filed for a direction upon the respondents U.P. Financial Corporation to execute the sale deed in favour of the petitioner in accordance with law.

The records reveal that an advertisement was issued in the newspaper for purchase of assets of M/s. Ravindra Foam Products (P) Ltd., Behjoi, Moradabad in respect of the proceedings taken under Section 29 by the U.P. Financial Corporation under the State Financial Corporation Act. The petitioner along with others responded to the aforesaid advertisement in which the offer of Smt. Neeru Jain for an amount of Rs. 4,65,000/- was accepted. The records also reveal that the amount offered by the petitioner was only Rs. 4,50,000/- and that the petitioner had also been asked to attend the meeting of the Negotiation Committee in respect of his proposal for purchasing the assets of M/s. Ravindra Foam Products (P) Ltd., Behjoi, Moradabad. The sale deed was executed on 4th July, 2005. This writ petition has been filed after a lapse of about eight months for quashing the aforesaid sale deed and for execution of the sale deed in favour of the petitioner.

In view of the fact that the offer of the petitioner was lower than the offer of Smt. Neeru Jain, we see no good reason to entertain this petition particularly when it has been filed after a lapse of eight months from the execution of the sale deed.

The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.  

Date: 27.3.2006

NSC-16456


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.