Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAM BHAROSE LAL SAXENA & OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ram Bharose Lal Saxena & Others v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT - C No. 15869 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 6664 (27 March 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

(Court No.51)

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 15869 of 2006

Ram Bharose Lal Saxena and others Vs.  State of Uttar Pradesh and others

Hon.S.U.Khan,J.

This writ petition is directed against order dated 10.2.2006 passed by CCRA/Board of Revenue, Allahabad in Stamp Revision No.101 of 2005-06.  Through the said order stay order has been granted in favour of petitioners-revisionists on the condition that they deposit 1/3rd amount which they are required to pay under the order which has been challenged through revision.  In the said order it was also mentioned that the revision should be listed for hearing on 12.3.2006.  According to learned counsel for petitioners the date has been extended to 29.3.2006 and recovery has been stayed till 29.3.2006.

Writ petition is disposed of with the direction that final arguments in the revision shall be heard on 29.3.2006 or on any date fixed after about two weeks there from.  Petitioner is at liberty to file copies of all the documents available on the file of trial court through affidavit so that records of the trial court may not be necessary before hearing of the revision.

Until 30.4.2006 recovery proceedings in pursuance of order challenged in the revision shall remain stayed.  However, if Board of Revenue after hearing the revision reserves the judgement then from the date of hearing till delivery of order recovery proceedings shall be stayed by the Board of Revenue.

Let a certified copy of this order be furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner on payment of usual charges by tomorrow.

27.3.2006

RS/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.