Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

C/M. SRI RAM NATH VIKAS VIDHYALAYA AND ANOTHER versus DEPUTY REGISTRAR FIRMS SOCIEITY AND CHITS AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


C/M. Sri Ram Nath Vikas Vidhyalaya And Another v. Deputy Registrar Firms Socieity And Chits And Others - WRIT - C No. 16948 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 6722 (28 March 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No.7

Civil Misc. Writ No.16948 of 2006

Committee of Management Sri Ram Nath Vikas Vidyalaya, Artara, District Hamirpur and another.                   Petitioners

       

                                        Versus

Deputy Registrar Firms Society and Chits, 122 Civil Lines, Jhansi and others.                                                    Respondents

                                                             

Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari, J

           Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.

The   grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents are delaying the matter by moving one application after another and the matter is not being heard finally.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition for commanding the S.D.M. Maudaha, District Hamirpur to decide case no. 1 of 2004, Kalu Ram Vs. Bhupender Dixit pending before him within a time bound frame fixed by this Court.

The counsel for the respondents has no objection to this prayer.

The Court does not know what is stage of the proceedings in the case. The petitioner may move an application in this regard before the Court concerned who will decide the application by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within a period of 15 days from the date of submission of a certified copy of this order.

With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

Dated 28.3.2006

CPP/-

The petitioner has made a representation dated 11.12.2004 to Chairman, Gorakhpur Development Authority, Gorakhpur, respondent no.1 in this regard which has remained unactioned till date.

The only prayer of the counsel for the petitioner at this stage is that a direction may be issued to respondent no.1 to decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 11.12.2004 within a time bound frame fixed by this Court.

The standing counsel has no objection to this prayer.

In the circumstances, the petition is disposed of finally with a direction to respondent no.1 to decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 11.12.2004 by a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of submission of a certified copy of this order.

The petitioner shall file a certified copy of this order before respondent no.1 within 15 days from today. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision of the representation, he may approach before the Labour Court under the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Dated 17.2.2006

CPP/-

           


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.