Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DABLU SINGH ALIAS VIJAI versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Dablu Singh Alias Vijai v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 15288 of 2005 [2006] RD-AH 6840 (29 March 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

COURT NO. 54

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 15288 OF 2005

Dablu Singh @ Vijai.......................................Applicant.

                   Versus

State of U.P............................................Opposite Party.

Hon. Mrs. Poonam Srivastava, J.

Heard Sri V.P.Srivastava learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

This is a bail application on behalf of Dablu Singh under Sections 147, 148, 149, 504, 302, 506 I.P.C. and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act.  Perusal of the First Information Report shows that there are as many as six accused and all of them are alleged to have opened fire on the deceased, which resulted in his death.  Argument advanced on behalf of the applicant is that according to the post mortem report, there are four incised wounds caused by sharp edged weapon, whereas narration of the First Information Report does not disclose this.  However, subsequently, witnesses have tried to allocate role of firing to the accused Dablu Singh and Bablu Singh, which is a definite improvement, only to support the post mortem report.  It has been brought to my notice that accused Rameshwar Singh has been granted bail by this Court in bail application no. 13494 of 2005 on 21.7.2005, Nagesh Tiwari in bail application no. 12382 of 2005 on 11.7.2005, Ashok Kumar Patel in bail application no. 13591 of 2005 on 25.7.2005 and Munmun Mishra in bail application no. 18265 of 2005 on 23.9.2005.  Occurrence has taken place at 9:30 a.m. in the month of April, 2005 and the First Information Report was registered at 2:30 p.m.  There was sufficient lapse of time between occurrence and lodging of the First Information Report.  Therefore, it is clear that version in the statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. has been changed after post mortem was conducted on the same day at 4:00 p.m.  

In the circumstances, I am of the view that the applicant shall be enlarged on bail. Observations made above shall not be considered as any opinion on merits of the case.

Let applicant Dablu Singh @ Vijai s/o Rambali Singh be released on bail in Case Crime No. 370 of 2005, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 504, 302, 506 I.P.C. and 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act  Police Station Line Bazar, District Jaunpur on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Dt. 29.3.2006

rkg


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.