Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SATYA PRAKASH SRIVASTAVA versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Satya Prakash Srivastava v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 17588 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 6969 (30 March 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.

Hon'ble Dilip Gupta, J.

This writ petition has been filed  raising the grievance that petitioner as well  respondent no. 4 had applied for allotment of a Betel Shop in the Court Compound of District Judgeship, Varanasi. In the advertisement for allotment, it had been made clear that if any person has not cleared all outstanding dues for the previous period, he shall not be entitled to get the allotment. However, the respondent no. 4 had not cleared outstanding dues for the last year, even then he had been allotted the Betel Shop illegally and arbitrarily, debarring the petitioner  for the said allotment.

The learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 has submitted that as the petitioner has already filed representation before the learned District Judge, Varanasi, it would be desirable that this Court may direct the learned District Judge to decide his representation considering all factual and legal submissions made.

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, we dispose of the writ petition requesting the learned District Judge, Varanasi, respondent no. 2, to consider the grievance of the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order, as well as a copy of the representation, is placed before him.

We have not  addressed ourselves to the merit of the case. Any observation made herein shall not influence the learned District Judge while taking the decision in this regard.

30.3.2006

AKSI/wp 17588/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.