Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT. SAKEENA versus DY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, MORADABAD & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Smt. Sakeena v. Dy. Director Of Consolidation, Moradabad & Others - WRIT - B No. 17368 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 6987 (30 March 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No. 40

Hon'ble S.N.Srivastava,J.

Issue notice to Opposite Party Nos. 2 to 9.  Petitioner shall take steps to serve these opposite parties within ten days by registered post.

List after service of notice.

Learned counsel for the petitioner urged that petitioner's chak allotted upto the stage of Settlement Officer Consolidation was disturbed by Deputy Direct of Consolidation without application of mind and without considering the grievance of petitioner.

Petitioner shall not be dispossessed from the chak allotted to her upto the stage of Settlement Officer Consolidation on the basis of order dated 17.12.2005 passed by Deputy Director of Consolidation, Moradabad.

Dt.30.3.06

SU/17368/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.