High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Details
SUBHASH CHANDRA PAL versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS
Case Law Search
Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation
Judgement
Subhash Chandra Pal v. State Of U.P. & Others - CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 3449 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 7165 (3 April 2006)
|
Hon.Amitava Lala,J.
Hon.Shiv Shanker,J.
Petitioner is stated that he is not owner of the place where the instrument was found but no such document is available presently.
Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, we are of the view that the concerned F.I.R., should not be interfered with in the present case particularly on the basis of the guidelines framed by the Supreme Court in the case as reported in AIR 1992 SC 604 (State of Haryana and others Vs. Ch. Bhajan Lal and others).
Therefore, the writ petition stands dismissed.
No order is passed as to costs.
However, in case petitioners/petitioner appear or produce before the court concerned and apply/applies for bail in connection with Case Crime No.52 of 2006, under Sections 60/63 Excise Act, 603/64 The Copy Right Act, 1957 and 418,419,420,465, 469 I.P.C., Police Station T.P. Nagar, District Meerut the same shall be decided in accordance with law.
Dt.3.4.06
Asha
W.P.3449/06
Copyright
Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites
Advertisement
dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |
Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.
Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.