Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BHAGWAN DAS & ORS. versus SRI SUMER CHAND

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Bhagwan Das & Ors. v. Sri Sumer Chand - SECOND APPEAL No. 280 of 1981 [2006] RD-AH 7181 (4 April 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No.48

Second Appeal No. 280 of 1981

Bhagwan Dass and others ......................Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Versus

Sri Sumer Chand and another ................. Defendants-Respondents.

*******

Hon'ble S.P.Mehrotra, J.

Case called out in the revised list.

None is present on behalf of the plaintiffs-appellants.

The case is listed today  before the Court under Chapter XII, Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court on account of failure on the part of the learned counsel for the plaintiffs-appellants in taking requisite steps for issuance of notice to the defendant-respondent Nos. 1 and 2 by Registered Post A.D., pursuant to the order dated 04-01-2006.

Even though the case is listed today under Chapter XII, Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court, requisite steps have not been taken on behalf of the plaintiffs-appellants.

As noted above, none is present on behalf of the plaintiffs-appellants even when the case has been taken up in the revised list.

In the circumstances, the Court has no option, but to dismiss the Second Appeal, as against the defendants-respondents Nos. 1 and 2 under Chapter XII, Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court for want of prosecution.

The Second Appeal is accordingly dismissed, as against the defendants-respondents Nos. 1 and 2 under Chapter XII, Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court for want of prosecution.

As the defendants-respondents Nos. 1 and 2 are the only respondents in the Second Appeal, the Second Appeal stands dismissed under Chapter XII, Rule 4 of the Rules of the Court for want of prosecution.

Dt. 04-04-2006/AK


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.