High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Km. Priti And Others v. Veer Bahadur Singh Purvanchal University And Others - WRIT - C No. 18997 of 2006  RD-AH 7324 (5 April 2006)
Court No. 7
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 18997 Of 2006
Kumari Priti and others Vs. Veer Bahadur Singh Purvanchal
University,Jaunpur through its Registrar
Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari, J.
Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.
This writ petition has been filed for quashing the impugned order dated 29.3.2006. It has also been prayed that the respondents may be directed to conduct the examination at the earlier examination centre which was allotted to the petitioners as mentioned in the Admit Card i.e. Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Rajkiya Mahavidyalaya Saidabad, Allahahad.
The petitioners are the regular students of B.A.Part II and are appearing in the examination of B.A. Part II 2006. They have been issued Admit Cards and in the Admit Cards their centre of examination was allotted Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Rajkiya Mahavidyalya, Saidabad, Allahabad.
It is alleged that during the examination period the petitioners' examination centre has been changed and Handia P.G. College, Handia has been allotted as new examination centre.
Aggrieved by the order-dated 29.3.2006 the petitioners have filed this writ petition.
The counsel for the petitioners submits that respondent nos. 1 and 2 without assigning any reason have illegally changed the examination centre at the midst of the examination and the action of respondent nos. 1 and 2 is arbitrary and malafide. He further submits that the petitioners are village girls and on account of change of examination centre they are facing much inconvenience and difficulty.
The counsel for the respondents submits that there is no illegality or infirmity in the impugned order and the examination centre of the petitioners has rightly been changed.
From perusal of the impugned order dated 29.3.2006 I find that there is no illegality or infirmity in it. The examination centre has been cancelled on the report of the Flying Squad. The authority is the best Judge as to which college is to be allotted examination centre or not. For the reasons stated above no interference is required by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. If the Court interferes in such matters at this stage there may be chaos as only the petitioners would be knowing the orders and all the other candidates who already have information regarding change of centre would suffer, as they would be reporting at the changed centre. It is therefore, not practicable to interfere in the matter now at the behest of only 3 students particularly when the examination is scheduled to be held from 7.4.2006 on ground of inconvenience to the petitioners.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.