High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Mohd. Yunus v. State Of U.P. And Another - WRIT - C No. 18769 of 2006  RD-AH 7335 (5 April 2006)
Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.
This is a writ petition against notice dated 31.1.2006 asking the petitioner to show cause as to why his constructions may not be demolished. The petitioner has already filed his reply to the said notice on 3.2.2006 before respondent no. 2. As it has not been decided, present writ petition has been filed.
We have heard counsel for the petitioner, the Standing Counsel and Sri V.K.Savita for the respondents.
In the circumstances of the case,it would be appropriate that the petitioner's reply dated 3.2.2006 may be decided by the concerned respondent by a reasoned order at an early date, if possible, within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petitioner along with certified copy of this order will also file a copy of his aforesaid reply, other necessary documents and a duly stamped self addressed envelope. The concerned authority after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner.
With these observations the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.