RAHUL SHIVHARE AND OTHERS versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Rahul Shivhare And Others v. The Union Of India And Others - WRIT - C No. 18892 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 7358 (5 April 2006)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon. Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.

Hon'ble Dilip Gupta, J.

Connect with Writ Petition No. 46359 of 2004.

We have heard Shri Rajesh Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Pramod Kumar, learned counsel for respondent nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 and the learned Standing Counsel for respondent no.5. Learned counsel for the respondents are allowed one month's time to file counter affidavit. The petitioners shall have three weeks thereafter to file rejoinder affidavit.

Until further orders of this Court, the respondents are restrained from interfering with the working of the petitioners as guide.

05.04.2006

AHA

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.