Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SALAHUDDIN versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Salahuddin v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 1301 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 7373 (5 April 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

                                                                                    Reserved

Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.   1301  of      2006

Salahuddin                      ...                       ..                       ...                     Applicant

                                         Vs.

State of U.P.                           ...                        ...                     ...                   Opp. Party

                                                                .......................

Hon. G.P. Srivastva, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

According to the prosecution case there was a strange relationship in between Smt. Sagma Begum daughter of the brother of complainant and her husband co-accused Shamiuddin who were married some 13 years back. On 3.11.05 when the complainant and other member of his family came out from masque after offering the Namaz the accused persons 10 in numbers including the applicant armed with fire arm fired upon the complainant party causing injuries to the complainant and his family members. In all three members of the family of the complainant and one outsider received injuries. The injury report of Ashfaq @ Munna and Haji Mohammad show that the injuries are dangerous to life and on vital part of the body. The injuries of Munna Lal was also dangerous to life and on vital part of the body.

In the circumstances of the case I am of the opinion that the applicant does not deserve bail. The bail application is rejected.

Dt. 5.4.06.

GNY


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.