Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

THAKUR PRASAD versus STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Thakur Prasad v. State Of U.P. And Another - WRIT - A No. 331 of 2004 [2006] RD-AH 740 (10 January 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari ,J

     Heard counsel for the parties and perused the  record.      

     This petition has been filed for non-payment of retiral dues to the petitioner.

   Counter affidavit has been filed by the Nagar Nigam Kanpur Nagar.  In paragraph 5 of the counter affidavit, it has been stated that an amount of Rs.68,979.50P towards gratuity has been paid to the petitioner through Cheque no. 949921 dated 9.8.2002; amount of Rs. 32,148/- towards leave encashment and amount of Rs.9,800 towards arrears of revised pay scale have been paid to him through cheque no.326208 dated 18.10.2004 and an amount of Rs.7229.70.70 towards Provident Fund has been paid through cheque no. 6787 dated 23.8.2001.  

    In paragraph 7 of the counter affidavit, it has been stated that the Nagar Nigam Kanpur is suffering from financial crisis and, therefore, the dues of the petitioner could not be paid.  Sri Y.S.Sachan, counsel for the respondent-Nagar Nigam states that the balance outstanding amount shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of one month from today.

   In this view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to pay the arrears of pension and other retiral dues of the petitioner within a month from today, as prayed by Sri Sachan, counsel for the Nagar Nigam.  In the event of failure, the entire balance amount of retiral dues of the petitioner shall be recovered as arrears of land revenue from respondent no. 2 within 15 days thereafter and shall be paid forthwith to the petitioner.  No orders as to costs.

Dt. 10.1.2006

kkb


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.