Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ANJU DEVI SACHAN versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Anju Devi Sachan v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 17513 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 7503 (10 April 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon. Tarun Agarwala,J.

The petitioner is a selected candidate and is not being allowed to join in the institution recommended by the Board, on account of the fact, that an intimation has been sent by the District Inspector of Schools indicating that there is no vacancy exists on the post in question, on account of the fact, that an interim order passed by the High Court.

Sri A.K.Yadav, the learned counsel for the Selection Board submitted that the interim order passed by the High Court was with regard to an adhoc appointment made by the  Committee of Management duly verified by the District Inspector of Schools and intimated to the Board, that appointment in any case come to an end with a regular selected candidate.

 In view of the aforesaid, I direct the Director of Secondary Education to make an inquiry under Section 17 of the U.P. Secondary Education (Service Selection Board) Act, 1982, and pass order within one month from the date of the receipt of the certified copy of this order. In the event the Director of Education  finds that a vacancy exists in the institution he will ensure compliance of the order of the Board that the petitioner will be given appointment in the institution. In the event the Director of finds that no vacancy exists in the institution he will intimate the Selection Board accordingly, who in turn will pass a fresh order of allocation of another institution in favour of the petitioner for his appointment within two weeks thereafter.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Dated:3.4.2006

AKJ(CP 17513/06)


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.