Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KALYAN SINGH AND OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Kalyan Singh And Others v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 2089 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 785 (12 January 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Arun Tandon, J.

It is stated on behalf of the petitioners that in the writ petitions, details whereof has been furnished in paragraph 5 and 6 to the present writ petition, the present petitioners were not a party and they have not approached this Court earlier for regularization of their services.

It is further submitted that the claim of the petitioners for regularization is not being considered on the ground that the petitioners have not passed High School Examination,  despite the fact that the petitioners have put in a long length of service as daily wage employee in the Forest Department of the State of U.P.. Petitioner seeks protection of the provisions of  the  U.P. Regularization of Daily Wages Appointments of Group 'D' Post Rules, 2001 and in that regard the petitioners have already made a representation dated 27th December, 2005, which is pending consideration before the respondent no. 3. It is further stated that the claim of other similarly situate candidates is scheduled to be considered on 17th January, 2006.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, it would be in the interest of justice to direct the respondent no. 3 to consider the claim of the petitioners along with other similarly situate candidates at the earliest possible in accordance with law as also in view of the judgment of this Court in the case of Sanjay Srivastava vs. State of U.P., Writ Petition No. 48322 of 2001   decided on 17th October, 2005, if possible on 17.1.2006 and in any case within four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is filed before him. It is ordered accordingly.

Writ petition stands disposed of.    

12.01.2006

Pkb/2089-06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.