Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

GAYA PRASAD VISHWAKARMA versus DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Gaya Prasad Vishwakarma v. Divisional Forest Officer And Others - WRIT - C No. 21594 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 8048 (20 April 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon. Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.

Hon. Dilip Gupta, J.

This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 2.5.1997 by which the licence of the petitioner's Sawmill has been cancelled and the order dated 22.12.2005 by which the renewal application has been rejected. .

Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that as licence has been cancelled vide order dated 2.5.1997, the application for renewal was not maintainable and it would be appropriate that the petitioner may file a fresh application for grant of licence. Learned Standing Counsel has also assured the Court that as the issue dealing with all legal and factual averments had already been decided in Chaudhary Chandan Singh Vs. State of U.P. & Ors., AIR 2005 Alld. 280, therefore, petition may be disposed of directing the respondent No.1 to consider the application of the petitioner for the grant of licence of the Sawmill in accordance with the said judgment. .

In view of the submissions made by the learned Standing Counsel, we dispose of this petition directing the respondent No.1 to consider the application of the petitioner for the grant of the licence of the Sawmill in the light of the directions issued by this Court in the aforesaid case expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of filing of a certified copy of this order along with a photostat copy of the said judgment by the petitioner before respondent No.1.

Dt/-20.4.2006

Sharma/21594


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.