High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Smt. Sushila Pandey v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 21899 of 2006  RD-AH 8168 (21 April 2006)
Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J
The licence of retail shop of kerosene oil of the petitioner was suspended on 20.2.2006 and the petitioner was asked for the reply/explanation. The petitioner submitted his reply/explanation before respondent no. 3 on 24.2.2006. As it has not been decided he has filed the present writ petition.
We have heard the counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel for the respondents.
In the circumstances of the case it would be appropriate that the petitioner's reply/explanation dated 24.2.2006 may be decided by the concerned authority by a reasoned order at an early date, and if possible, within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petitioner alongwith certified copy of this order will also file a copy of his aforesaid reply explanation, other necessary documents and a duly stamped self addressed envelope. The concerned respondent after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner.
With these observations the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.