Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MANOJ KUMAR SHUKLA versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Manoj Kumar Shukla v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT - C No. 22285 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 8217 (24 April 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.

Hon'ble  R.K.Rastogi,J.

The petitioner was appointed as fair price shop dealer on the basis of  the resolution passed by the Gram Panchayat Pandar in 2001. Thereafter another  resolution had been passed on 25.7.2005 by Gram Panchayat  for grant of fair price shop licence  to respondent no. 3. Then the petitioner filed a representation  dated 4.4.2006 before respondent no.2  apprising him that he still holds a valid authorization to run the    fair price shop which has neither been suspended nor cancelled. As it has not been decided, present writ petition has been filed.

     We have heard counsel for the petitioner and   the Standing Counsel for the respondents.

In the circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate that the petitioner's representation dated  4.4.2006 may be decided  by the concerned  respondent by a reasoned order at an early date,  if possible, within three  months  from the date of receipt of certified copy of  this order. The petitioner along with certified copy of  this order will  also file a copy of  his aforesaid  representation, other  necessary  documents and a duly stamped self addressed envelope. The concerned   authority   after taking decision will  communicate the same to the petitioner. The respondent no.2  while  passing any order on the petitioner's representation may also give opportunity to  respondent

no. 3.

With these observations the writ petition is disposed of.

Dated.24.4.2006

RPP/WP.22285/2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.