High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Manoj Kumar Shukla v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT - C No. 22285 of 2006  RD-AH 8217 (24 April 2006)
Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.
The petitioner was appointed as fair price shop dealer on the basis of the resolution passed by the Gram Panchayat Pandar in 2001. Thereafter another resolution had been passed on 25.7.2005 by Gram Panchayat for grant of fair price shop licence to respondent no. 3. Then the petitioner filed a representation dated 4.4.2006 before respondent no.2 apprising him that he still holds a valid authorization to run the fair price shop which has neither been suspended nor cancelled. As it has not been decided, present writ petition has been filed.
We have heard counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel for the respondents.
In the circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate that the petitioner's representation dated 4.4.2006 may be decided by the concerned respondent by a reasoned order at an early date, if possible, within three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The petitioner along with certified copy of this order will also file a copy of his aforesaid representation, other necessary documents and a duly stamped self addressed envelope. The concerned authority after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner. The respondent no.2 while passing any order on the petitioner's representation may also give opportunity to respondent
With these observations the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.