High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
M/S. Jai Trading v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 19438 of 2006  RD-AH 8312 (25 April 2006)
Hon. Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.
Hon. Dilip Gupta, J.
The controversy raised in this petition is identical to the controversy raised in Writ Petition No. 18085 of 2006 (M/s. Trilochan Rice & Alloy Mills Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.) which we have allowed today.
In view of the reasons contained in the aforesaid judgment, we set aside the decision to cancel the auction contained in the communication dated 31.3.2006 sent by the Executive Engineer to the petitioner and direct that the petitioner shall now be permitted to deposit the Bank Draft as was required to be deposited under the communication dated 17.3.2006 within such reasonable time as the Corporation may now indicate in writing to the petitioner.
The writ petition, therefore, succeeds and is allowed. There shall be no orders as to costs.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.