Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT. MANORAMA MISHRA versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' SECRE., LOCAL BODY MINISTRY AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Smt. Manorama Mishra v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secre., Local Body Ministry And Others - WRIT - A No. 1934 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 833 (12 January 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Rakesh Tiwari ,J

           Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.

  The Standing counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no.1 and Sri Vivek Singh, Advocate has accepted notice on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3.

           The husband of the petitioner died on 11.3.2001 after retirement from service on 31.5.1999. The grievance of the petitioner is that she has not been paid the post death retiral dues and family pension as yet by the respondents.

           An employee is entitled to retiral benefits on his/her retirement for which formalities have to be got completed by the departments before the date of retirement of the employee. Non-payment of retiral dues is hit by Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

            In the circumstances, the respondents are directed either to pay the aforesaid dues of the petitioner with 10 per cent compound interest from due date till the date of payment within a period of 6 weeks from today or they may show cause within two months by filing counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within 3 weeks thereafter. In case the cause/counter affidavit is not filed within the time allowed by this Court, respondent nos. 2 and 3 shall be personally present in Court on the date fixed.  

           List thereafter.

Dt. 12.1.2006

CPP/-1934-2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.