High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Rajesh Kumar v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT TAX No. 789 of 2006  RD-AH 8439 (26 April 2006)
Hon'ble Sushil Harkauli, J.
Hon'ble Vikram Nath, J.
In view of prayer no. b of this writ petition and also in view of the fact that during course of arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is prepared to make payment of entire dues in respect of the vehicle/Jeep No. U.P.62-F 5822, which has been assessed at Rs.1,21,332/-, in instalments and also in view of other facts stated in this writ petition, we direct that the recovery of the said amount will not take place provided the petitioner deposits the aforesaid amount in six almost equal quarterly instalments. The first instalment is to be paid on or before 30.6.2006.
However, in case of default, this interim order will stand automatically vacated and the entire amount will become recoverable.
If the entire amount is deposited in accordance with the aforesaid schedule, no recovery charges will be payable by the petitioner.
On payment of first instalment, the vehicle in question will be released forthwith, but only after paying entire balance amount the petitioner will be permitted to ply the vehicle.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.