High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Details
Case Law Search
Judgement
Rati Ram v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 22838 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 8446 (26 April 2006)
|
Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.
Hon'ble R.K.Rastogi,J.
1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition against the order dated 31.3.2006 passed by respondent no.2.
2. We have heard counsel for the petitioner and the Standing counsel for the respondents.
3. The suspension order states that the charge sheet is being given separately. In case it has not already been served then respondent no. 2 may serve the charge sheet within one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Thereafter the petitioner may reply the same. Respondent no. 2 may decide the entire proceeding at an early date, if possible, within three months from the date of filing of reply to the charge sheet. The petitioner while filing reply will file a certified copy of this order; necessary documents and a duly stamped self addressed envelope along with the reply. Respondent no.2 after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner.
4. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
Dated.26.4.2006
RPP/WP.22838/06
Copyright
Advertisement
Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.