High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
M/S R.K.B.K. Automobiles v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 23320 of 2006  RD-AH 8597 (28 April 2006)
Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.
The map of petitioner was sanctioned on 26.10.2005. The petitioner was given a notice by Gorakhpur Development Authority, Gorakhpur on 20.3.2006 to show cause why proceedings for cancellation of sanctioned map be not started. The petitioner submitted reply dated 23.3.2006 to the respondent no.3 against the same. Thereafter the respondents passed orders on 28.3.2006 staying further constructions and in pursuance of which the Secretary, Gorakhpur Development Authority passed orders to this effect on 29.3.2006, hence the present writ petition.
We have heard counsel for the petitioners, the the Standing Counsel and Sri S.K. Dubey for the respondents.
The petitioner is permitted to correct the description of respondent no.2.
In the circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate that the petitioner may file a fresh representation before respondent no. 2. In case the representation is filed, it may be decided by the said respondent by a reasoned order at an early date, if possible, three weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. The petitioners will file a certified copy of this order; necessary documents and a duly stamped self addressed envelope along with the representation. The concerned authority after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner.
With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.