Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SAGIR AHAMAD AND OTHERS. versus IMTIYAJ AHAMAD AND ANOTHERS.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sagir Ahamad And Others. v. Imtiyaj Ahamad And Anothers. - WRIT - C No. 23143 of 2004 [2006] RD-AH 8639 (28 April 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court no. 25

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.   23143 of 2004.

Sagir Ahmad and others. ... Petitioners.

Versus

Imteyaj Ahmad and another. ... Respondents.

Hon'ble Rajes Kumar, J.

By means of present writ petition, the petitioners are challenging the order dated 14.5.2004 passed by the District Judge, Mau.

The brief facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that the petitioners filed a Suit no. 930 of 2001 Sagir Ahmad and others Versus Imteyaj Ahmad and another in the Court of Civil Judge, (Jr. Div.), Mau for permanent injunction alongwith an application for interim order.  The Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Mau vide order dated 13.2.2004 granted injunction to maintain status-quo on the spot.  Against the said order, respondents filed Appeal before the District Judge.  The District Judge, Mau vide impugned order, allowed the appeal and set aside the order passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Mau on 13.2.2004.

Heard Sri Dharmendra Srivastava, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ramesh Rai, Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 and 2.

Both the learned Counsel for the parties are agreed that the writ petition may be disposed of with the direction to Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Mau to dispose of the Suit itself expeditiously.  Having regard to the facts of the case and the Suit being of 2001, Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Mau is directed to dispose of the Suit no. 930 of 2001 Sagir Ahmad and others Versus Imteyaj Ahmad and another expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from today.

With the aforesaid observations, writ petition stands disposed of.

Dt:28.04.2006.

MZ/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.