High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Sunil Kumar v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2323 of 2006  RD-AH 8759 (1 May 2006)
Hon'ble M. K. Mittal, J.
Heard Sri Dharmendra Singhal, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A.
Supplementary affidavit filed today be taken on record.
Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that appellant has been convicted in S. T. No. 887-B of 2004 by the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C., Court No. 1, Kanpur Nagar and sentenced to under go rigorous imprisonment for five years.
Prosecution case is that the accused was found manufacturing sutli bombs without having any license. The contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that license was in the name of the brother of the appellant but it was for a different place.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, accused be released on bail during pendency of this appeal in S.T. No. 887-B of 2004 on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.
The recovery of the half of the amount of fine as imposed on appellant shall remain stayed during pendency of the appeal and the balance amount shall be deposited before he released on bail.
The record of the lower court be also requisitioned.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.