Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHAKIL & ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Shakil & Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 8449 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 8907 (3 May 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon.Shiv Shanker,J.

Heard argument of learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A.

It is contended on behalf of the accused applicants that present accused applicant Shakil has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 26.4.2006 regarding Case Crime No.23 of 2006, under Sections 379,411 I.P.C., P.S. Kasna, District Gautam Budh Nagar wherein it was alleged that one motorcycle of Pulser was allegedly recovered from his possession. It is further contended that one motorcycle of  Yamaha relating to the present case, was allegedly recovered from Rahisuddin  and another accused person has already been challaned in the present case. Stolen property of the present case, was not allegedly recovered from the possession of the accused applicant Shakil. It was allegedly recovered from the possession of another accused applicant Rahisuddin. The bail application of Shakil in another Case Crime No.23 of 2006, under Sections 379 and 411 I.P.C. relating to theft and recovery of the motorcycle has already been granted bail.

After considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the bail application of the applicants is liable to be allowed.

The bail application is allowed. Let  applicants Shakil and Rahisudddin  involved in   case Crime No.30 of 2006, under Sections 379 and 411 I.P.C., Police Station Kasna, District Gautam Budh Nagar be released on bail on each of them furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction  of the concerned Court.

Dt.3.5.06

Asha

B.A.8449/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.