High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Shio Raj Singh Talan v. State Of U.P. And Another - WRIT - A No. 129 of 2006  RD-AH 9066 (5 May 2006)
Hon'ble Sushil Harkauli, J.
Hon'ble Vikram Nath, J.
We have examined the impugned order of the Tribunal dated 30.11.2005, which mentions that the case of the respondent of this appeal, i.e., Tiger Steels Tubes Pvt. Ltd. throughout, has been that the fake invoices, which were used by Ambika Steels for the benefit of Ambika Steels, were never issued by the Tiger Steels. It does not appear that the Tiger Steels got any benefit from these invoices.
It is also obvious that Ambika Steels prepared fake invoices in the name of Tiger Steels, the latter cannot be punished unless there was some evidence to link Tiger Steels with the preparation or uses of the fake invoices. There is no such evidence on record.
In the circumstances, we do not find any question of law arising from the impugned order of the Tribunal, which is based on a pure question of fact that there is no evidence to link Tiger Steels with the fake invoices.
Appeal is dismissed as above.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.