Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DEEPAK versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Deepak v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 3647 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 9181 (9 May 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No. 54

CRIMINALMISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3647 OF 2006.

Deepak Vs. State of U.P.

Hon. Mrs. Poonam Srivastava, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

Counter affidavit has been filed by the State which is taken on record.

The applicant is husband. The occurrence has taken place in the intervening night of 17/18.7.2005. The report has been lodged on 27.7.2005 at 9.30 P.M. The submission on behalf of the applicant is that the first information report is considerably delayed. The deceased died as a result of an accident. There are no ante-mortem injuries and post mortem report do not show any mark of ante-mortem injury but for superficial to deep burn all over the body. According to the first information report, the demand for coloured Television and motorcycle was constant and on account of the deceased being subjected to cruelty, a criminal case was also instituted. There was reconciliation in Pilibhit Paramarsh Kendra, as a result of which the girl was sent with her husband but later she died on account of burn injuries. An unnatural death occurred within seven years of marriage. The allegation of demand of dowry is evident from the perusal of the first information report. Learned counsel for the applicant has tried to show that the husband has got her admitted in the hospital. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the husband can not escape from his responsibility. No case for bail is made out. The bail application is rejected.

Dt/-9.5.2006.

Rmk.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.