High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Smt. Archana Dixit v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 1513 of 2006  RD-AH 925 (13 January 2006)
Hon'ble Sushil Harkauli,J.
Hon'ble Vikram Nath, J.
Heard Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
The petitioner claims that certain payment is due to him for certain works performed by him for the respondents, but the payment has not yet been made to him.
In view of the above averments, we direct that if the petitioner makes a detailed representation along with certified copy of this order to respondent no. 2 giving full particulars of the petitioner's claim, i.e. The works done by him and the amount due for each work, itemwise, with details and copies of such documents supporting the claim as may be available with the petitioner, respondent no. 2 will have the averments of the petitioner in the said representation verified and will thereafter pass appropriate reasoned orders or directions, as may be called for, in the light of the facts found by the said respondent, within two months of the date on which the aforesaid documents are received by the said respondent.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.