Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT. VIDYA & OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Smt. Vidya & Others v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT - C No. 25363 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 9259 (9 May 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Janardan Sahai, J.

      Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel who represents respondents 1, 2 and 3 and Sri Anuj Kumar, who represents respondent no.4. Sri Anuj Kumar does not propose to file any counter affidavit.

        A complaint under Section 198 (4) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act was filed against several allottees of Gaon Sabha land. One of them was Harfool who was the opposite party no.7 in the complaint case. An application was filed by the other opposite parties that Harfool has died and the complaint be dismissed. The application has been rejected. Against that order the petitioners filed a revision, which was dismissed by the Additional Commissioner, Saharanpur. The petitioners have challenged these orders.

       It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the order of rejection was passed without application of mind. However, it is not in dispute that the land, which the petitioners have been allotted, is separate from the land, which was allotted to Harfool. As such even if Harfool has died that fact will not effect the maintainability of the case against the petitioners. The petitioners are not affected.

        If Harfool has died his heirs would have to be given notice to continue proceedings against the patta of Harfool but there is no bar to proceedings against the petitioners or the other opposite parties.

         With the above observations the writ petition is disposed of.

9.5.2006.

s.wp.25363/06.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.