High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Vinay Kumar @ Manoj Kumar v. Dy. Director Of Consolidation, Bulandshahar & Others - WRIT - B No. 25341 of 2006  RD-AH 9272 (9 May 2006)
Hon'ble S.U.Khan J
This writ petition is directed against order-dated 7.4.2006 passed by D.D.C Bulandshahr in Revision No. 1066 Ram Bhull Versus Rohtash and others.
The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner Vinay Kumar is that even though petitioner was respondent in the revision however no notice was served upon him and he was not heard before passing the impugned order.
If it is so then petitioner may file restoration/rehearing application before D.D.C concerned. It is needless to say that in case D.D.C finds that petitioner was neither served nor represented in the revision then he will recall the order dated 7.4.2006 and decide the revision again on merit after issuing notice and hearing all the parties concerned.
With the above observations writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.