Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

JAI PAL SINGH AND ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Jai Pal Singh And Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 8779 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 9311 (10 May 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No. 30

Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 8779 of 2006

Jai Pal Singh and another Vs. State of U.P.

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicants Jai Pal Singh and Pradeep alias Deepak indicted in case crime No.466  of 2005 (Case No. 1001 of 2005) under section 307  I.P.C.  P.S. Kampil District Farrukhabad.

Heard Shri S.A.N. Shah, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

On 20.9.2005 at about 8.30 P.M. the applicants and two co-accused are said to have opened fire at complainant and his brother Indrajeet Singh from country made pistol with intention to kill them. The injury report of Indrajeet Singh indicates the presence of  gun shot wound of  entry two in number size .2 cm X .3 cm X muscle deep   on right lateral side of lower chest 7 cm. below the right nipple. The injury report of  Arvind Singh indicates  the presence of  three gun shot wound of entry on left lateral side of chest 5 cm below left nipple size .3 cm X .1 cm to .2 cm X .1cm X skin to muscle deep.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that initially the case was registered under section 324 I.P.C. and applicants were granted bail. The learned counsel pointed out that charge sheet was submitted under section 324 I.P.C. and cognizance was taken for the said offence. The contention of the learned counsel was that on the application of the prosecution cognizance was taken under section 307 I.P.C.

Learned A.G.A. submitted that injuries caused by fire arm are on the vital part of the body.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced by both the parties.

There is no X-Ray or supplementary medical reports of the injured persons. The injuries are skin to muscle deep. The charge sheet was submitted for an offence punishable under section 324 I.P.C. In the backdrop of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.

Let the applicants Jai Pal Singh and Pradeep alias Deepak indicted in case crime No.466  of 2005 (Case No. 1001 of 2005) under section 307  I.P.C.  be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/8779/06

10.5.2006

Court No. 30

Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 8779 of 2006

Jai Pal Singh and another Vs. State of U.P.

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicants Jai Pal Singh and Pradeep alias Deepak indicted in case crime No.466  of 2005 (Case No. 1001 of 2005) under section 307  I.P.C.  P.S. Kampil District Farrukhabad.

Heard Shri S.A.N. Shah, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

On 20.9.2005 at about 8.30 P.M. the applicants and two co-accused are said to have opened fire at complainant and his brother Indrajeet Singh from country made pistol with intention to kill them. The injury report of Indrajeet Singh indicates the presence of  gun shot wound of  entry two in number size .2 cm X .3 cm X muscle deep   on right lateral side of lower chest 7 cm. below the right nipple. The injury report of  Arvind Singh indicates  the presence of  three gun shot wound of entry on left lateral side of chest 5 cm below left nipple size .3 cm X .1 cm to .2 cm X .1cm X skin to muscle deep.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that initially the case was registered under section 324 I.P.C. and applicants were granted bail. The learned counsel pointed out that charge sheet was submitted under section 324 I.P.C. and cognizance was taken for the said offence. The contention of the learned counsel was that on the application of the prosecution cognizance was taken under section 307 I.P.C.

Learned A.G.A. submitted that injuries caused by fire arm are on the vital part of the body.

I have taken into consideration the submissions advanced by both the parties.

There is no X-Ray or supplementary medical reports of the injured persons. The injuries are skin to muscle deep. The charge sheet was submitted for an offence punishable under section 324 I.P.C. In the backdrop of these facts, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.

Let the applicants Jai Pal Singh and Pradeep alias Deepak indicted in case crime No.466  of 2005 (Case No. 1001 of 2005) under section 307  I.P.C.  be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/8779/06

10.5.2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.