Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus M/S. JAMSHEDPUR ENGINEERING & MACHINES MANUFACTURING CO.

Supreme Court Cases

1994 SCC Supl. (1) 510

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


UNION OF INDIA & ORS V. M/S. JAMSHEDPUR ENGINEERING & MACHINES MANUFACTURING CO. [1993] RD-SC 251 (30 April 1993)

PUNCHHI, M.M.

PUNCHHI, M.M.

JEEVAN REDDY, B.P. (J)

CITATION: 1994 SCC Supl. (1) 510

ACT:

HEADNOTE:

ORDER

1. Objections raised to the award being made Rule of Court are two in number. The first is that the Arbitrator should not have awarded a sum of Rs 1,000 as damages and that the damage to the Union of India is at a much higher figure.

The second objection is that the Arbitrator should not have awarded interest at the rate of 15 per cent from March 1979 to 1990 on the price outstanding and unpaid.

2. As is obvious, these objections pertain to the merits of the case. These are not entertainable as objections to the award. Nothing is reflected in the objection petition as to the conduct of the Arbitrator or to the arbitration proceedings. The 511 objections have thus no merit and accordingly the same are dismissed. Correspondingly, the award is made Rule of the Court. I.A. No. 2 and C.A. No. 6256 of 1990 are disposed of accordingly.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.