Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BABU SINGH versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' PRINCIPAL SECY. PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPTT.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Babu Singh v. State Of U.P. Thru' Principal Secy. Panchayat Raj Deptt. - WRIT - C No. 26021 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 9391 (11 May 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon. Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.

Hon. Dilip Gupta, J.

This petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 9.6.2005 passed by the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj, Government of U.P. and for a direction upon the respondents to constitute a separate Gram Sabha of village Udaipur from the Gram Sabha Kalakhuri as the village Udaipur has the population over 1000 and satisfies with all legal requirements.

The petitioner had earlier approached this Court by filing Writ Petition No. 25166 of 2005 which was disposed of by us by the order dated 1.4.2005 by directing that the representation filed by the petitioner for constituting a separate Gram Sabha shall be disposed of in accordance with law. The representation was ultimately decided against the petitioner by the Principal Secretary by means of the order dated 9.6.2005 which has been impugned in the present petition.

This petition is highly belated and no satisfactory explanation has been furnished in the petition for explaining the delay in filing this petition. It is, therefore, likely to be dismissed on this ground. This apart, we are of the opinion that the order impugned cannot be said to suffer from any infirmity as valid and cogent reasons have been given in the said order. In any view of the matter, it is not a fit case for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.  

Dt/- 11.5.2006

Sharma/26021


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.