Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

M/S SIYARAM RICE MILLS (P) LTD. STATION ROAD MAINPURI versus CHIEF MANAGING DIRECTOR, BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


M/S Siyaram Rice Mills (P) Ltd. Station Road Mainpuri v. Chief Managing Director, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. - WRIT - C No. 26185 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 9407 (11 May 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon. Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.

Hon. Dilip Gupta, J.

This petition has been filed for a direction upon the respondents to renew the agreement entered into between the petitioner and Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL).

The averments made in the writ petition reveal that an agreement dated 25.9.2002 was entered into the petitioner and BSNL in respect of the distributorship for marketing and distributorship of Cellular Mobile Prepaid Services. It has also been stated in the petition that the respondents did not renew the agreement in favour of the petitioner and nor was the refund amount paid to the petitioner. The records of the writ petition also reveal that the petitioner has already filed a detailed representation dated 13.4.2005 followed by a reminder dated 14.11.2005 but no orders have been passed on the said representation.

We have heard Sri Sant Saran Upadhyaya, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri B.N. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

Sri B.N. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has stated that the General Manager (U.P. West), BSNL, Shastri Nagar, Meerut shall expeditiously pass an appropriate order on the representation filed by the petitioner.

In view of the aforesaid statement, we dispose of this petition with the direction that the General Manager (U.P. West) shall pass an appropriate order on the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner expeditiously preferably within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced by the petitioner before the said Officer.

Dt/- 11.5.2006

Sharma/26185


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.