High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Ram Awadh & Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2604 of 2006  RD-AH 9422 (11 May 2006)
Hon'ble Mukteshwar Prasad, J.
Hon'ble Vinod Prasad, J.
Connect this criminal appeal with Criminal Appeal No. 2547 of 2006.
Office is directed to summon the record within four weeks.
We have heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A. for the State. We have gone through the impugned judgment as well as lower court record also.
It is contended on behalf of the appellants that as per judgment of the court below, the appellants were exhorting their associates to kill Khusiyal, brother of the informant, and no active role has been assigned to them.
In view of the role played by the present two appellants, we find it appropriate to enlarge the appellants on bail. It is also contended that the appellants were on bail in the court below and they have not misused the liberty allowed to them.
Let the appellants--Ram Awadh and Ram Kesh be enlarged on bail during pendency of appeal on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Gorakhpur in S.T. No. 267 of 1995 State Vs. Ram Awadh and others provided the appellants deposit a sum of Rs.5000/- as fine in the court below within a period of one month today. The recovery of remaining amount of fine shall remain stayed.
The Chief Judicial Magistrate will send photocopies of the bail bonds to the Court immediately.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.