High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Kanhaiya Lal v. State Of U.P.& Others - WRIT - A No. 33520 of 1994  RD-AH 9607 (16 May 2006)
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 33520 of 1994
Kanhaiya Lal .......................................................... Petitioner
State of U.P. & others ........................................... Respondents
Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.
Heard counsel for the petitioner.
By this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 30.5.1994 passed by the respondent no. 3 directing termination of all daily wage ad hoc employees working on Class III and Class IV posts appointed on 17th July, 1991 or subsequently. On the basis of the said order the petitioner who was appointed on daily wage basis, was directed to be terminated. Petitioner has also prayed for commanding the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue in service on the post held by him and to pay his arrears of pay since July, 1993.
Petitioner's case in the writ petition is that the petitioner was engaged on daily wage basis vide order dated 22.2.1993 and thereafter continued to work on daily wage basis. Copy of the order dated 22.2.1993 is filed as Annexure -l to the writ petition which indicate that the petitioner has been engaged on daily wage basis on temporary basis till further orders. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied on the supplementary affidavit dated 12.2.2001 in which it has been averred that two persons Sanjay Kumar and Krishan Dayal who were, according to the petitioner, also working on daily wage basis, have been allowed to continue. It is contended that directing other daily wagers to continue is arbitrary.
I have considered the submissions and perused the records.
A detailed counter affidavit has been filed in which it has been stated that the policy decision was taken to terminate the daily wagers appointed on or after 17th July, 1991. The petitioner having been appointed on daily wage basis on 22.2.1993 without complying any statutory rules of appointment, no error can be found in the order dated 30.5.1994 directing for termination of all daily wage employees. A policy decision has been taken to terminate the daily wage employees appointed on 17.7.1991 or thereafter. No fault can be found in the said order. The petitioner was not appointed on any post according to statutory rules governing The recruitment. Engagement of the petitioner being on daily wage basis he had no right to the post. In so far as the submission of the petitioner that Sanjay Kumar and Krishan Dayal have been allowed to continue, a supplementary affidavit has been filed by the petitioner himself indicating the reasons. A letter was issued on 12.10.1994 by the District Programme Officer asking the aforesaid two persons to appear for type test on 21.10.1994 in pursuance of the Directorate letter dated 6.10.1994. It appears that the said two persons appeared for type test and thereafter another order was passed in their favour in January, 1996 appointing them as a temporary clerk. Thus Sanjay Kumar and Krishan Dayal have not been allowed to continue on daily wage basis but their continuance is on the basis of their selection for appointment as temporary clerks by the Directorate in pursuance of the decision dated 6.10.1994. The submission of the petitioner that the other daily wage employees have been allowed to continue which is discriminatory and arbitrary has no substance. The petitioner's prayer in the writ petition is to quash the order dated 30.5.1994 and directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue in service on the post held by him and to pay his arrears of salary. As observed above, the petitioner having been appointed on daily wage basis de horse the rules no ground has been made out to quash the order dated 30.5.1994.
The writ petition lacks merit and is dismissed.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.