ANOOP SINGH versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Anoop Singh v. State Of U.P. And Others - APPLICATION U/s 482 No. 5162 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 9667 (17 May 2006)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.

This application is filed by the applicant Anoop Singh with a prayer to quash the order dated 6.2.2006 passed by the learned C.J.M. Varanasi in Criminal Case No. 3567 of 2005 whereby the application praying therein for discharge moved by the applicant has been rejected.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that no fair investigation has been done, even then the charge sheet has been submitted by the I.O. There is no evidence against the applicant to show his involvement and no offense is made out against him.

From the perusal of the record and the impugned order it appears that the applicant is named in the F.I.R. and on the basis of the material collected by the I.O.  there is sufficient material to proceed further with the case, therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned order dated 6.2.2006 is refused.

 

However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant it is directed that in case  the applicant  appears before the court concerned within 30 days from today and   applies for bail the same shall be considered and disposed of  expeditiously if possible on the same day in accordance with the provisions of law in Criminal Case No.  3657 of 2005 State Vs Satish Singh and other under Sections 307, 504, 506 and 120-B I.P.C. P.S. Rohaniya district Varanasi If any NBW issued against the applicant the same shall be kept in abeyance only for 30 days   from today.

With the above directions the application is finally disposed of.

Dated: 17.05.06

Rcv/5162-06

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.