Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJ KUMAR MISRA versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Raj Kumar Misra v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT - C No. 26906 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 9722 (17 May 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Janardan Sahai, J.

       Sri M. D. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an auction for grant of fishery lease in respect of Gaon Sabha pond on plot no. 1340 was held on 2.2.2006 in which the petitioner was the highest bidder and papers for grant of approval were sent to the S.D.O. but the same are pending consideration of the S.D.O. and he has not passed any order in respect of approval or disapproval. It is submitted by the petitioner's counsel that the approval has been granted to the auction of the other four ponds held on the same day  in pursuance of the same publication and Munadi.  It is also submitted that the petitioner has filed a representation-dated 24.4.2006 to the Pargana Adhikari, Naugarh, Siddharth Nagar but no order has been passed thereon and it is submitted that a direction be given to decide the representation.

         I have heard the learned Standing Counsel and Sri Anuj Kumar who represents the respondent no.3.

        Without expressing any opinion upon the merits of the petitioner's case the writ petition is disposed of finally with the direction to the S.D.O., Naugarh, Siddharth Nagar to pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner expeditiously and if possible within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order along with a true copy of the representation is filed by the petitioner before him.

      Copy of this order be made available to the learned counsel for the parties on payment of usual charges within three days.

17.5.2006.

s.wp.26906/06.

       


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.