Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

I.H. SIDDIQUI versus CHIEF MANAGER, BANK O/F BARODA, MEERUT AND ANOTHER

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


I.H. Siddiqui v. Chief Manager, Bank O/F Baroda, Meerut And Another - WRIT - A No. 2209 of 2006 [2006] RD-AH 988 (16 January 2006)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

           Court No. 29

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.   2209 of 2005

I. H. Siddiqui ......................  ........Petitioner.

Vs.

Chief Manager, Bank of Baroda

Meerut and another        ......... Respondents.

***

Hon'ble V.M. Sahai, J.

Hon'ble Barkat Ali Zaidi, J

1. Heard Sri D.S. Pandey, learned  counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vipin Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

2. The petitioner is a bank employee, whose services have already come to an end by a dismissal order passed by the respondent-bank. Even his departmental appeal has failed, against which a writ petition filed by him is pending  before this Court, yet he is occupying a house allotted by the bank to him bearing Flat No.205, Laxmi Lok, Eves Crossing, Meerut. The respondent-bank wants his accommodation to be vacated, which the petitioner does not want to oblige and has brought this writ petition  seeking stay. His prayer may not be given favour by this Court for two reasons; (i) though his writ petition is pending  yet for the present  he has no locus-standie in the service of the respondent bank and (ii)  he is occupying the said flat even after his dismissal.

3. In the circumstances narrated  above,  the present  writ petition has no legs to stand and is liable to be dismissed. However, to be  a bit compassionate, we allow the petitioner two months time from the date of issuance of a certified copy of this order to vacate the aforesaid accommodation of the respondents, failing which the respondent- bank will be authorized  to take coercive measures  to evict  him by the aid of the police Meerut.

4. With this direction,  this petition is  disposed of finally.  

Dt: 16.1.2006

  n.u.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.