High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Kanhaiya Lal v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT - C No. 25008 of 2007  RD-AH 10024 (24 May 2007)
Hon'ble Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.
Hon'ble Rajes Kumar, J
Heard Sri Rajendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri H.P. Dubey, learned counsel for respondent No. 2, 3, 4 and 6 and learned Standing Counsel.
The grievance of the petitioner is that the meter which was standing in the name of his father, who had died earlier. The petitioner had applied for permanent dis-connection of electricity line and has also deposited the requisite fee , but the respondent is not taking any action for disconnection. In this regard he has filed representation. Sri H.P. Dubey, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the respondent no.4 may be directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner.
In view of the above, we dispose of the writ petition requesting the respondent no.4 to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of filing of certified copy of the order by a speaking and reasoned order after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.