High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Purushottam @ Pratham v. State Of U.P. & Others - CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 6752 of 2007  RD-AH 10058 (24 May 2007)
Hon'ble Sushil Harkauli, J.
Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Singh, J.
There are three cases shown against the petitioner in the FIR. The learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that third case is of police encounter in which no recovery has been made from the petitioner. In first two cases the petitioner has been bailed out. It has been argued that in view of the above, the present FIR should be quashed and petitioner's arrest should be stayed. The argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner is misconceived. Recovery from each of the accused is not essential for establishing the guilt, and bail does not prove innocence.
The writ petition is therefore dismissed.
RCT/-Crl.W.P.No. 6752 of 07
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.