Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

PURUSHOTTAM @ PRATHAM versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Purushottam @ Pratham v. State Of U.P. & Others - CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. 6752 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 10058 (24 May 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Sushil Harkauli, J.

Hon'ble Ajai Kumar Singh, J.

There are three cases shown against the petitioner in the FIR. The learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that third case is of police encounter in which no recovery has been made from the petitioner.  In first two cases the petitioner has been bailed out. It has been argued that in view of the above, the present FIR should be quashed and petitioner's arrest should be stayed. The argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner is misconceived.  Recovery from each of the accused is not essential for establishing the guilt, and bail does not prove innocence.

The writ petition is therefore dismissed.

Dated: 24.05.2007

RCT/-Crl.W.P.No. 6752 of  07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.