High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Krishna Lal v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 2873 of 2007  RD-AH 1065 (17 January 2007)
Hon'ble Amitava Lala, J.
Hon'ble R.K. Rastogi, J.
Petitioner's contention is that he can be construed as scheduled caste candidate out of the departmental promotee. The contention of the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 2 to 4, the University, is that his employment can not be construed as departmental promotee. In any event, he is ready and willing to consider the representation of the petitioner before the date of interview i.e. 25th January, 2007, when the petitioner was also called to participate.
Hence, in disposing the writ petition we direct the Vice Chancellor, Sardar Ballabh Bhai Patel, University of Agriculture & Technology, Meerut, the respondent no. 3 herein, to consider the representation of the petitioner before the date of interview i.e. by 22 January, 2007 upon giving fullest opportunity of hearing and by passing a reasoned order thereon. For the purpose of effective adjudication a copy of the writ petition along with its annexures can also be treated as part and parcel of the representation.
Thus, the writ petition stands disposed of.
No order is passed as to costs.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.