Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Rajendra And Another v. State Of U.P - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 1075 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 1087 (17 January 2007)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

  Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A. and Sri B.N. Pandey and Sri Ram Ji Singh learned counsel for the complainant.

        It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that  according to the prosecution version the applicants discharges shots when the first informant was going to lodged the F.I.R. but due to this shot  nobody received any injury. The case of the applicant is distinguishable with the case of the co-accused Shiv Ram Singh and Shiv Kumar. The applicants dis not cause any injury.

In reply of the above contents it is submitted that the applicants are very powerful persons. In case they released on bail, they shall tamper with evidence.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicants and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case the applicants are entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicants Rajendra and Yogendra  involved in case crime no. 688       of 2006  under Sections 147,148,149,307,302,504,447I.P.C., P.S. Vijay Nagar l   District Ghaziabad  be released on bail on their  furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the condition that the applicant shall not tamper with the evidence and he shall  report to the court of C.J.M. concerned in the first week of each month till conclusion of the trial t  show his good behaviour.  

In default of the above condition the bail granted to him shall be deemed cancel and he shall be taken into custody by the C.J.M. concerned.

Dated: 17.1.2007



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.